APOCALYPTIC IMAGERY IN "THE IDIOT" AND "THE DEVILS"

W. J. Leatherbarrow, University of Sheffield

Dostoevsky's period of penal servitude in Siberia, amongst the lowest depths of criminal humanity, wrought a decisive change in both his personality and his art. His estrangement from naive utopianism, from the belief that human nature was capable of sustaining a paradise on earth, whether erected upon a rational, moral or social order, was caused, or at least accelerated, by this profound personal experience. It is to this event, too, that we must ascribe Dostoevsky's development as a Christian artist in the years following his return from Siberia. Robert L. Jackson has recently argued that Dostoevsky's fictional memoirs of his prison experiences, "Notes from the House of the Dead, " (1860) are "the pivotal literary and spiritual work in Dostoevsky's writing career" and "a kind of programmatic statement of a Christian poetics of insight and transfiguration, " which becomes the binding vision of Dostoevsky's mature fiction. (1)

Parallel to Dostoevsky's emergence as a Christian writer is his developing use of Christian mythology, symbolism and allegory in the works written after "The House of the Dead. " His commitment to a Christian ideal was expressed in the weaving of Christian motifs into the fabric of his art. Thus the conversion of Raskolnikov is implicitly likened to the raising of Lazarus; Dostoevsky's ethical ideal, the "positively good man, " Prince Myshkin, is developed as a latter-day Christ; an attack on the intellectual contagion of Russia's radicals is couched in the parable of the Gadarene swine ("The Devils"); and the family drama of the Karamazovs is a microcosm of metaphysical conflicts. There are, of course, many other such examples, large-scale and small, embedded in the fictional world of the mature Dostoevsky.

Within this pattern of biblical motifs imagery and allegory drawn from the apocalyptic revelations of St. John occupy a particularly significant place, and reveal much about the nature of Dostoevsky's Christian vision. This apocalyptic colouring emerged suddenly in Dostoevsky's works of the 1860s, and appears to be linked to his increasing awareness of the nature of Western European society. "Winter Notes on Summer Impressions" (1863), which chronicles Dostoevsky's first trip abroad in 1862, draws apocalyptic conclusions from the widespread materialism, rationalism and capitalism which Dostoevsky had observed in the major European capitals. Thus, for example, London and its Crystal Palace, erected for the world exhibitions of 1851 and 1862, are compared directly to Babylon and a "prophecy from the Apocalypse. " (2)

44

Moreover, there is a pressing sense of imminent doom in Dostoevsky's descriptions of European life. In "Crime and Punishment" too, disturbing apocalyptic echoes are to be found, suggesting the passing of the present order. While in Siberia Raskolnikov dreams of a plague, or trichina, which infects all but a few in Europe with madness:

New kinds of germs (t r i k h i n y ) appeared, microscopic creatures which lodged in the bodies of men. But these creatures were spirits endowed with reason and will. Those infected with them at once became possessed and insane. But never before had people considered themselves so wise and so unshakably right as these infected men. . . Whole populations, whole towns and nations were infected and went mad . . . Fires began, famines began. Everyone and everything was being destroyed ... (3)

Not only is the whole tenor of this passage apocalyptic, but certain details are also clearly drawn from "Revelation, " in particular the outbreaks of pestilence, famine and fire. A puzzling feature of Raskolnikov's dream is that plague comes from the east, from Asia, whereas, given Dostoevsky's political views, we might well have expected it to originate in the West. Such a minor inconsistency does not, however, detract from the dream as an indicator of Dostoevsky's apocalyptic vision.

But the two most apocalyptic of Dostoevsky's works are "The Idiot, " completed in 1869, and "The Devils, " completed in 1872. (4) Both possess a distinctive, urgent, almost hysterical tone not matched by Dostoevsky's other great novels. In "Crime and Punishment" one feels that the spiritual disease that afflicts Raskolnikov has not yet spread to everyone in the novel, and the work ends with a promise of reconciliation, not the threat of Armageddon. "The Brothers Karamazov" too ends with a promise, as Alesha and the children meet over little Iljusha's grave and pledge loyalty to his memory. But "The Idiot" and "The Devils" end with the eruption of that death and violence which has threatened throughout both novels. In "The Idiot" the murder of Nastasja Filippovna precipitates the return of Myshkin to darkness, and the hope contained in Stepan Trofimovich's last pilgrimage, which concludes "The Devils, " is not enough to offset the orgy of murder and suicide that accompanies it.

Interestingly, these two most apocalyptic of Dostoevsky's novels belong to that protracted period which the author spent abroad. He had fled Russia in early 1867 to escape debts and improve his health, and he was not to return until July 1871. Perhaps we can trace the hysteria of these two novels partly to the fact that Dostoevsky was separated from the Russia he was trying to describe and kept in touch through newspapers, hardly the source of a balanced picture of life's texture. Moreover, Dostoevsky -touchy, overwrought and profoundly nationalistic - was compelled to spend his period of separation from Russian roots in Western Europe, that bustling, over-commercial, over-industrialised seat of rationalism, socialism and revolution, a source of plagues which since Peter the Great had been threatening to engulf his own native land. For Dostoevsky Western

45

Europe was a most eloquent symbol of modern man's spiritual decline, and it was from this vantage point that he made his observations of Russia. "The Idiot" ends on a revealingly anti-Western note as Mrs. Epanchina cries: "It's time we came to our senses. And all this, all this life abroad, all this Europe of yours, it's all just a delusion, and all of us abroad are just a delusion. . . Mark my words, you'll see for yourself! " (5)

As Solzhenicyn was to do more than a century later, Dostoevsky marks his period of unwilling "exile" in the West with a bitter warning that the quest for material security without the framework of a governing moral principle will mean the fall of Western civilisation, and he expands his warning to include Russia's westernised ruling classes. From its earliest conception "The Idiot" was intended to portray the decline of a Russian family through its emphasis on material, rather than spiritual, riches. This idea survives and is expressed most vividly, if somewhat ridiculously, in the character of Lebedev, that comic mouthpiece of serious ideas. At the Prince's birthday gathering (Part III, Ch. 4) Lebedev, a self-styled interpreter of the Apocalypse, is goaded into an attack upon the spiritual vacuum of modern society: "All of this as a whole is damned, sir? The whole spirit of these last few centuries of ours, taken as a whole with its scientific and practical emphasis, is perhaps indeed damned, sir! " (6) Modern man in his relentless drive to satisfy the demands of reason, egoism and material necessity has lost the sense of spiritual well-being to be derived from an ideal which provides moral and metaphysical certainty. Modern man has no faith; only science, industry, commerce and capital. Lebedev complains that it is folly to try to erect a material fortune upon a basis of spiritual poverty, and directs this particular criticism at contemporary socialists with their "carts bringing bread to the whole of humanity, without a moral basis for this action. " (a quotation that combines a well-known statement by the Russian socialist, Alexander Herzen, with Christ's injunction that man should not live by bread alone) (7) In a deliciously irreverent anecdote Lebedev goes on to tell of a twelfth century man who, after twenty years of cannibalism, confessed and went to the stake for his sins. What was it, asks Lebedev, that drove him to confession despite the tortures that awaited him?

There must have been something much stronger than the stake and the flames, stronger even than the habits of twenty years? There must have been an idea stronger than all misfortune, famine, torture, plague, leprosy and all that hell which mankind could not have endured without that binding idea which guided men's hearts and enriched the waters of life. Show me something resembling that force in our age of vice and railways . . . Show me an idea that binds mankind today with even half the force as in those centuries. . . And don't try to intimidate me with your prosperity, your riches, the infrequency of famine today and your rapid means of communication! There is more wealth now, but less strength; the binding idea is no more; everything has grown soft; everything and everyone is over-coddled! ... (8)

46

Lebedev's frenetic ravings reveal the polemical core of the novel. His preposterous tale of the spiritually sound cannibal contains the germ of Dostoevsky's own apocalyptic vision of modern Europe, doomed by its spiritual flabbiness to wallow in the trivia of material well-being without the governing force that gives life purpose. Lebedev's ideas are rescued from ridicule when they are repeated in essence by the novel's seriously conceived hero, Prince Myshkin. In a conversation with Ippolit late in the novel Myshkin characterises nineteenth century man as a spiritual nomad, devoid of certainty:

. . . Men in those days (I assure you I've always been struck by this) were not at all the same people as we are now, not at all the same race. They were a different breed. People in those days were somehow motivated by a single idea, but nowadays they are more nervous, more developed, more sensitive. They seem to be motivated by two or three ideas at the same time. Modern man is broader, and I swear this prevents him from being such an integrated creature as he was in those times. . . (9)

Myshkin's subsequent violent outburst against socialism and Catholicism at the soiree where he is introduced to the Epanchin family's friends is a further development of this view of contemporary European man:

Why, socialism too is the child of Catholicism and the essential catholic nature! It too, like its brother atheism, was born of despair, in opposition to Catholicism as a moral force, in order to take the place of the lost moral force of religion, to quench the spiritual thirst of parched humanity! . . . (10)

In his conclusions, however, Myshkin is more cautious than Lebedev, who sees nothing but damnation as a consequence of mankind's spiritual poverty. Lebedev finds a symbol of mankind's state in the vivid apocalyptic image of the four horsemen:

We are in the time of the third horse, the black one, and of the rider with the balance in his hand, for everything in our age is weighed in the balance and settled by agreement, and people are only seeking their rights: "a measure of wheat for a penny, three measures of barley for a penny, " and with all this they still want to keep a free spirit, a pure heart, a healthy body and all the rest of God's gifts. But they won't keep them by demanding their rights alone, and there will follow the pale horse, and he whose name is Death, and after him comes Hell. . . (11)

This apocalyptic image dominates the novel; it is taken up and embellished by a whole network of lesser references to "Revelation. " (12) These echoes of the central image do not always lend themselves to precise interpretation or to close analogy with the events and characters of the novel, but they do serve to sustain in the reader's mind the apocalyptic note struck by Lebedev, and thus to colour the way he looks at the events

47

of the novel. For example, there is an unsettling resemblance between the Apocalypse's central concern with judgement and condemnation and the same themes as represented in the situations and characters of "The Idiot. " In this way Myshkin's anecdotes about the execution he witnessed in Lyons and the friend who was condemned to death only to be reprieved at the last moment, as well as Ippolit's view of himself as condemned by nature, all fit into the apocalyptic frame of the novel.

Moreover, the fallen state of nineteenth century Europeanised Russia may be compared quite closely to the fall of Babylon described in the Apocalypse. Chapter 18, Verse 2, for instance, describes a Babylon that has become "the habitation of devils" and "a cage of every unclean and hateful bird. " For Dostoevsky, peering myopically at Russia from distant Europe, his native land appeared indeed to teem with all kinds of devils -socialists, nihilists and atheists - and he was to incorporate this idea in the very title of his later novel, "The Devils. " But the Russia depicted in "The Idiot" is also overrun with a multitude of "unclean and hateful birds": there is the moneylender, Pticyn, whose name derives from the Russian word p t i c a , meaning "a bird"; there is the mendacious Lebedev himself (lebed' - "a swan"), as well as the avaricious Ganja Ivolgin ( i v o l g a - "an oriole").

In other proper names too echoes of Lebedev's explanation of the Apocalypse may be detected. For example, the image of the third horseman is revived in "The Scales, " the name of the hotel where Myshkin arranges to meet his young friend Kolja, shortly before Rogozhin's attack. Furthermore, the person who protects Mrs. Epanchina as a protege, who is regarded as an arbiter of taste by the false society she inhabits and whose blessing Myshkin has to receive before he can be welcomed in society, is a certain Princess Belokonskaja, whose name suggests the fourth horse, Death ( b e 1 o - "white" ; k o n ' - "horse").

Such are the perhaps rather cheap devices used by Dostoevsky to fashion the corrupt society depicted in "The Idiot" into a nineteenth century equivalent of doomed Babylon, awaiting only the arrival of the Lamb, the Son of God, and the terrible judgement he will bring. As we might expect, Dostoevsky's Babylon, like its biblical equivalent, is presided over by a "whore, " the wilful Nastasja Filippovna, seduced as a young woman by the businessman, Tockij, and now bent upon a perverse revenge involving her own destruction. Details from the biblical account of the fall of Babylon are strikingly revived in Dostoevsky's novel. Chapter 18 of "Revelation, " for example, describes how "the kings of the earth, who have committed fornication and lived deliciously with her (the whore), shall bewail her, and lament for her, when they shall see the smoke of her burning. . . And the merchants of the earth shall weep and mourn over her. . . and shall stand afar off for the fear of her torment, weeping and wailing." (Verses 9, 11 and 15) In Dostoevsky's apocalypse the kings of the earth are, as Ganja Ivolgin recognises, the merchants themselves, the men of money; and three of them - Epanchin, Tockij and Pticyn - at the end of Part I bemoan the self-destructive course pursued by Nastasja Filippovna, yet at the same time are afraid of her and stand to one side.

48

Nastasja Filippovna's deliberate self-abasement, her urge to confirm her fall from innocence publicly by scandalous scenes and by parading herself as "Rogozhin's slut" are all part of an elaborate, if perverse and indirect, scheme of revenge against those who have abused her, a vengeance which she knows will culminate in her own death at the hands of Rogozhin. As Pticyn remarks to Tockij at the end of Part I, this behaviour is similar to that of the Japanese warrior who disembowels himself before his enemy as a form of aggression. Yet, alongside her desire for vengeance, which is nurtured by deliberately sharpening her consciousness of her fallen state, Nastasja Filippovna yearns also for her own lost innocence. This, of course, a paradoxical state, for innocence and vengeance cannot coexist. Yet Nastasja Filippovna persists in longing for both, a situation dramatised in the way she is equally drawn throughout the novel to two men: to Myshkin, who sees only her innocence, and to Rogozhin, who confirms her fallen state and her right to revenge. It is fitting that the novel's allegorical nature, the clear linking of its themes with similar ones to be found in the Apocalypse, should also include the divided nature of Nastasja Filippovna; for, as well as being the fallen woman at the heart of this modern Babylon, she is also, as her surname, Barashkova, implies, associated with the Lamb (barashek- "lamb"), the Bible's symbol of innocence and forgiveness. The Lamb, the Christ-figure, to be introduced into Dostoevsky's apocalyptic allegory is the novel's meek and saintly hero, the idiot Prince, Lev Nikolaevich Myshkin.

The climate of "The Devils" is also unmistakably apocalyptic. As in "Revelation" a series of catastrophes presages the final disaster of the fete and its aftermath. The outbreaks of incendiarism and cholera in the district call to mind the scourges of fire and plague which accompany the Last Judgement. The apocalyptic mood is sustained by Karmazinov, who compares the decline of Western Europe with the fall of Babylon (13) and by Kirillov, who confesses that he reads the Apocalypse at night to Fedka the convict (14). Moreover, the warning of the Apocalypse that "there will be time no more" and that the old heaven and earth will yield to the new is grotesquely echoed in Kirillov's belief that at the moment he takes his own life and proclaims the deification of man, time will be frozen and a new era of human life will arrive. (15)

This apocalyptic note is struck not just by those characters and situations at the centre of "The Devils. " The general climate of Russia in the novel is apocalyptic, and moral confusion is the dominant feature of an age which lacks a unifying faith. Petr Verkhovenskij details this moral confusion and the spiritual rootlessness of contemporary man when he describes to Stavrogin his plans for harnessing these features to his drive for power. He explains, how in the present age even the best men lack conviction, how people no longer think for themselves and are consequently the slaves of any strong will:

Listen ... Do you realise that we are very powerful already? It's not just those who kill and burn. . . who belong to us. Listen, I've reckoned them all up: the teacher who laughs with his children at

49

their God and at the home which nurtured them is already ours. The lawyer who defends an educated murderer by pleading that he is more developed than his victim and had no choice but to kill in order to get money, he too is already ours. Schoolboys who kill a peasant for the thrill of it are ours. The juries who acquit criminals without distinction are ours. The prosecutor who trembles in court because he is not liberal enough is ours, ours. Administrators, writers - oh, there are lots and lots of us, and they don't know it themselves! On the other hand the readiness of schoolboys and fools to obey has reached the highest point. . . Do you realise how many we shall win over with just a few shabby, ready-made ideas? (16)

In another passage from the Apocalypse, cited in "The Devils, " the Laodiceans are rejected by God for being "neither cold nor hot. " Petr intends to take advantage of a similar ethical half-heartedness among contemporary men by creating and spreading the legend of Stavrogin as a mysterious and majestic figure who is at present in hiding, but who will in time emerge and rescue his people from chaos. Petr is convinced, perhaps with justification, that in times of uncertainty people will cling even to the most unlikely myth if it promises a return to order. At the right moment Petr will spring his protege into a position of supreme power.

Here again Dostoevsky's debt to "Revelation" is unmistakable. Chapter XIII of the Apocalypse describes a time to come when the earth will be ruled by a beast with supreme power who is worshipped for his mystery and majesty. The way is paved for this beast by a false prophet who "exerciseth all the power of the first beast before him, and causeth the earth and them which dwell therein to worship the first beast. " (Verse 12) The false prophet, moreover, "maketh fire come down from heaven on the earth in the sight of men," deliberately deceives, inflames the myth of the beast, and destroys all who do not believe his fabrications. It is difficult not to see in these figures the "wild beast," Nikolaj Vsevolodovich Stavrogin, and his false prophet, Petr Verkhovenskij. The notions of supremacy and power are contained in their names - verkhovenstvo means supremacy; Nikolaj suggests conqueror of nations; and Vsevolod means master of all. Petr's first appearance in the novel is to announce the arrival of Stavrogin, whom he plans to make men worship. On the night of the fete he too makes fire come down to earth by organising the incendiarism which claims the lives of Lebjadkin and his sister. He too is a master of deceit and duplicity, which he practises most successfully on the Governor's wife and the members of the discussion circle. And finally he too disposes most adroitly of Shatov and whoever else rejects his deceptions. Moreover, the beast from "Revelation" has ten horns (Stavrogin's name is constructed around r o g , meaning "horn") and possesses great physical strength ("Revelation, " Chapter 13, Verse 2), which corresponds to Stavrogin's much-mentioned strength. Symbolism such as this enlarges the significance of Petr and Stavrogin, the two main sources of chaos and destruction in the novel. They outgrow their functions as political intriguers and acquire metaphysical characteristics. They are indeed the devils, reaping what is due to them in the spiritual wilderness of nineteenth-century Russia.

50

As in "The Idiot" the apocalyptic colouring of "The Devils" is deepened by the use of minor symbols and references, which although of limited intrinsic interest do nevertheless sustain an even apocalyptic texture throughout the novel. The frequency of proper names derived from birds, which in "The Idiot" pointed to the biblical description of Babylon as "the habitation of devils and a cage for every unclean and hateful bird" and suggested that Russia was doomed to a similar fate, is met again in "The Devils. " Indeed, the Stavrogin estate, from which so much of the novel's discord originates and where the murder of Shatov takes place, is named Skvoreshniki and suggests skvorechnik, a sort of birdcage. (17) The surnames Drozdov, Lebjadkin and Gaganov all take their roots from the names of birds: d r o z d ("thrush"); 1 e b e d ' ("swan"); and gaga ("eider"). Maria Lebjadkina expresses her disappointment in Stavrogin by describing him as a falcon ( s o k o 1) who has changed into an owl ( f i 1 i n ); (18) and when at the end of the novel Varvara Petrovna rushes to be with the dying Stepan Trofimovich, she offensively dismisses his companion, Sofija Matveevna, as an "odd bird" and a "crow" (vorona). Only after recognising the Bible-seller as a good woman does she address her more respectfully.

Stavrogin and Petr are at the centre of the novel's apocalyptic design, yet, as we have seen, neither's name fits into the tradition of bird references. However, Stavrogin's name does have apocalyptic connotations: his surname has clearly diabolic implications, whereas a form of his first name, Nikolaj, is actually found in "Revelation" as the Nicolaitans, an heretical sect practising immorality and idolatry, condemned by John in Chapter II, Verses 6 and 15. (19)

In a working paper of this kind to draw firm conclusions from Dostoevsky's persistent use of apocalyptic motifs in the fiction of his middle years would clearly be unwise. Yet these motifs are there and they are prominent, and this would seem to disclose Dostoevsky's lack of enthusiasm for the utopianist's dream of a future heaven on earth. Indeed, one could go further and suggest that apocalyptic imagery serves in Dostoevsky's art as a counterbalance to the recurring image of the Golden Age, experienced by several of Dostoevsky's characters, including Stavrogin himself.

The dream of the Golden Age, when men live in a state of harmony with each other and with creation, illumines the dark corners of Dostoevsky's fictional world, but it is a retrospective ideal rather a prophetic one. In the kind of Golden Age which Dostoevsky sensed in Claude Lorrain's painting, "Acis and Galatea, " we are returned to the sinless paradise which mankind experienced in Genesis, before the fall from grace. It is a paradise that has been lost, and which depicts man before the capacity for evil was developed in his nature. In the contemporary world described in Dostoevsky's novels such a dream of innocence palpably fails to accord with human nature. In "Winter Notes on Summer Impressions" Dostoevsky had acknowledged that men "don't have a nature capable of brotherhood, " (20) and this lies at the heart of what for Dostoevsky was the moral

51

failure of utopianism. It does not recognise that the capacity for good and evil is inherent in the nature of man. Until human nature is transfigured by religious experience the kind of primitive harmony described in images of the Golden Age must remain an alluring dream. "Revelation" is not about the perfectibility of the present order, but its destruction, not paradise on earth, but in a world to come: "And I saw a new heaven and a new earth: for the first heaven and the first earth were passed away. " (Chapter 21; Verse 1) If the dream of the Golden Age looks wistfully back to the dawn of man and his innocence, then Dostoevsky's apocalyptic vision acknowledges his sinful nature and anticipates the terrible judgement that stalks him. Paradise awaits the chosen, but in the next world, not in this.

NOTES

1. R. L. Jackson, The Art of Dostoevsky. Deliriums and Nocturnes, Princeton, 1981, p. xi.
2. F. M. Dostoevskij, Polnoe sobranie sochinenij v tridcati tomakh, Leningrad, 1972, V, p. 70. (This edition is hereafter designated as P.S.S.)
3. P.S.S. , VI, pp. 419-420.
4. The aim of the present paper is not to provide an exhaustive analysis of apocalyptic motifs in Dostoevsky's works, but merely to indicate a profitable line of research. The material presented here is based largely on the treatment of these themes in my book: Fedor Dostoevsky, Boston, 1981.
5. P.S.S. , VIII, p. 510.
6. P.S.S. , VIII, p. 310.
7. A. I. Gercen, Sobranie sochinenij v tridcati tomakh, Moscow, 1954-1966, XI, p. 402.
8. P.S.S. , VIII, p. 315.
9. P.S.S. , VIII, p. 433.
10. P.S.S. , VIII, p. 451.
11. P.S.S. , VIII, pp. 167-168.
12. R. Hollander, "The Apocalyptic Framework of Dostoevsky's 'The Idiot', in Mosaic 7, 1974, p. 123-139.
13. P.S.S. , X. p. 287.
14. P.S.S. , X. p. 282.
15. P.S.S. , X, pp. 187-189.
16. P.S.S. , X. p. 324.
17. Skvorechnik derives from skvorec, a starling, and is a sort of bird-box. The key word used in Russian translations of the Bible is pristanishche, a refuge, which is closer to skvorechnik than the English "birdcage. "
18. P.S.S. , X, p. 218.
19. G. A. Buttrick (ed.), The Interpreter's Dictionary of the Bible, New York, 1962, III, pp. 547-548.
20. P.S.S. , V, p. 81.