GRADUATE STUDENT WORKSHOP 2007-2008
scheduled talks
Fall 2007 TermBenjamin Pottruff
The Anarchist Peril: Propaganda by Deed and Race Making in the Gilded Age and Progressive Era
Doctoral Candidate in History at the University of Toronto
Thursday, October 18th 2009, 2-3 pm
Munk Centre, room 108N
Abstract: Narratives of anarchist violence were uncomfortably common in the United States during the Gilded Age and Progressive Era. For a very small minority within radical movements Propaganda by Deed was above all a class critique, and these violent acts repeatedly occurred within the context of industrial unrest. However, a generation middle class professionals, captivated by the ideas of racial fitness suggested by social Darwinism and a criminal system much inflected by the Italian criminologist Cesare Lombroso, scrutinized the bodies of assassins as the site at which counter claims over the meaning of anarchist violence could be authenticated. Popular conceptions of insanity articulated by the press were refined and validated in scientific circles as medical professionals and criminologists, through psychological assessments, photographs, and autopsy reports, developed a system of classification that legitimated racial and pathological constructions. In doing so, reporters, police officials, and medical professionals looked past the critiques and focused instead on their bodies, particularly for signs of racial and mental degeneration.
Bio: Benjamin Pottruff’s dissertation investigates a violent series of assassinations and bombings at the turn of the century in the United States. Ben is a graduate of the University of Waterloo with a Bachelor and Masters Degree in History and Peace and Conflict Studies.
Tom Young
Limited Access: Understanding shifts in the disposition of land and resources in northern Vermont
Doctoral Candidate in Geography at the University of Toronto
Thursday, November 15th 2009, 2-4 pm
Munk centre, room 108N
Abstract: This project looks at how people experience and respond to changes in access to land and natural resources. “Access” in this sense refers to the distribution of benefits that are derived from the land. Land and the organisms that it sustains supply an incredible variety of benefits, both tangible and intangible, and these benefits are assigned different values by different people. This lack of agreement about what aspects of the land are most valuable is one of the factors leading to conflicts over land use. Another factor relates to institutional design rather than differing values; here disagreements stem from differences over how recognized benefits should be distributed among various constituencies. This research seeks to tease out the various threads knotted together in the conflicts over land use in Vermont.
Bio: Tom Young’s research investigates the interaction between discourses relating to land in environmental decision-making. His dissertation builds from field research in Vermont following two pieces of legislation: one focusing on a program that taxes land as its use value rather than its market value, the other trying to set up a new program that fosters housing development by exempting designated areas from environmental review and permitting. Tom is a recipient of the 2007-2008 Graduate Research Grant in American Studies and/or the Study of the United States.
Winter 2010 Term