GRADUATE STUDENT WORKSHOP 2008-2009
scheduled talks
Fall 2008 TermWelcome Coffee Social
Wednesday, September 25th 2009, 2-4 pm
Munk centre, room 108N
Debra Thompson
Nation, Miscegenation and the Census: the Regulation of Mixed-Race in Comparative Context
Candidate in Political Science at the University of Toronto
Thursday, October 30th 2008, 2-4 pm
Munk Centre, room 108N
Abstract: This dissertation explores the changing legal definitions of “mixed-race” in Canada, the United States, and Great Britain. It will compare the regulation of “mixed-race” within institutional classificatory regimes such as anti-miscegenation laws and censuses, demonstrating the existence of global trends of institutionalized “race-making” and challenging conventional domestic explanations for racial categorization. Ultimately, this research seeks to understand the processes by which “race” and “mixed-race” categories are created or negated, manipulated or abolished.
Bio: Debra Thompson received a Bachelor of Public Affairs and Policy Management and a Master of Arts in Legal Studies from Carleton University and is currently a PhD Candidate in Political Science at the University of Toronto. Prior to returning to academia, she was a policy analyst in the Department of Indian Affairs and Northern Development. Her research interests include the politics of race and gender, law and public policy, comparative politics, and critical legal theory. Her most recent article, "Is Race Political?" is published in the September 2008 issue of the Canadian Journal of Political Science. Debra Thompson is also a recipient of the 2008-2009 Graduate Research Grant in American Studies and/or the Study of the United States.
Samantha Ann Majic
COYOTE's daughters: exploring the evolution of the American prostitutes' rights movement and the radical possibilities of nonprofit service provision
Doctoral Candidate in Political Science at Cornell University
Thursday, November 20th 2008, 2-4 pm
Munk centre, room 108N
Abstract: My research traces the evolution of the prostitutes' rights movement in the US, considering in particular the formation (by various sex workers involved in the movement) of 2 nonprofit health service organizations, the California Prevention and Education Project (CAL-PEP) and the St James Infirmary (SJI). Both are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, receive funding from different levels of government and-- contrary to historical precedent--are run by sex workers who provide free, nonjudgmental health services to other sex workers. Drawing from various social movements literatures (particularly Piven & Cloward), and literature regarding nonprofits' engagement with the welfare state, the SJI and CAL-PEP are used as cases to consider what happens to the radical impulses and claims-making activities of an oppositional social movement when they are institutionalized into service provision organizations and partner with state agencies. Through participant-observational fieldwork, I find these organizations must negotiate 2 "vectors of political constraint": their status as nonprofits under section 501c3 of the IRC, and the data collection requirements imposed on them by various granting agencies. However, this is not simply a co-optation story: the SJI and CAL-PEP have maintained a commitment to prostitutes’ rights both discursively (they hold that sex work is WORK like any other) and operationally (by involving sex workers in the provision of health services and employing a non-judgmental harm reduction philosophy of service provision).
Bio: Samantha Majic completed her undergraduate degree in political science and economics at the University of Toronto in 1997. She spent the following year as an intern at the Ontario Legislature and then completed an MA in political science at York University, Toronto, in 2003 before beginning the PhD program at Cornell. Her current research interests are in American politics, looking specifically at domestic public policies and gender, with a focus on sex work laws and activism in the United States.
Alexandra Rahr
From Weedpatch to Yellowstone: Migrant Labour Camps, the National Park System and Expansionist Asylum in 1930s America
Doctoral Candidate in History at the University of Toronto
Thursday, November 22nd 2009, 2-4 pm
Munk centre, room 108N
Abstract: My research traces the evolution of the prostitutes' rights movement in the US, considering in particular the formation (by various sex workers involved in the movement) of 2 nonprofit health service organizations, the California Prevention and Education Project (CAL-PEP) and the St James Infirmary (SJI). Both are located in the San Francisco Bay Area, receive funding from different levels of government and-- contrary to historical precedent--are run by sex workers who provide free, nonjudgmental health services to other sex workers. Drawing from various social movements literatures (particularly Piven & Cloward), and literature regarding nonprofits' engagement with the welfare state, the SJI and CAL-PEP are used as cases to consider what happens to the radical impulses and claims-making activities of an oppositional social movement when they are institutionalized into service provision organizations and partner with state agencies. Through participant-observational fieldwork, I find these organizations must negotiate 2 "vectors of political constraint": their status as nonprofits under section 501c3 of the IRC, and the data collection requirements imposed on them by various granting agencies. However, this is not simply a co-optation story: the SJI and CAL-PEP have maintained a commitment to prostitutes’ rights both discursively (they hold that sex work is WORK like any other) and operationally (by involving sex workers in the provision of health services and employing a non-judgmental harm reduction philosophy of service provision).
Bio: Samantha Majic completed her undergraduate degree in political science and economics at the University of Toronto in 1997. She spent the following year as an intern at the Ontario Legislature and then completed an MA in political science at York University, Toronto, in 2003 before beginning the PhD program at Cornell. Her current research interests are in American politics, looking specifically at domestic public policies and gender, with a focus on sex work laws and activism in the United States.
Winter 2009 Term